Process is so efficient that you shouldn't see serious differences in the (The CIL has to be JITĬompiled at run time into CLR the native code doesn't. Performance than with the Visual (CIL) compilers. You could use the native codeĬompilers from either of these vendors for that and you will get a better Using them for traditional batch processing is anĮxpensive and unnecessary indulgence. The Visual products are OO COBOL compilers that shine when runningĬomponents in. Is still a better deal that paying run time fees on what they distribute.) NetĬompiler and maintenance is mandatory. (You can expect to pay over $10,000 for the Fujitsu NetCOBOL for. Many people are moving to Fujitsu to avoid the run time fees. Nobbled DEMO or "student" editions it is a four-seat minimum.įor Micro Focus, the run time fees are killing it and the price they quote You may not be able to buy a single licence for either of the Visual COBOL
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |